Wednesday, February 5, 2014

Twitter as an Epistolary Form


            I think it’s safe to say that Twitter is a huge component of the media and marketing of businesses and of our personal lives as well. Five years ago, if you saw something with a ‘#’ (or a hashtag) sign in front of it pop up during your favorite television show or sporting event, you’d think, ‘What on earth?’ Now everything has a Twitter presence, and it’s safe to say that Twitter is one of the most self-expressive platforms we have available to us currently. The way Twitter works is interesting, though; it’s a combination of tweeting things yourself, and re-tweeting or replying to things you can relate to, things you feel similarly about, or things that you simply think to yourself, ‘I couldn’t have said it better myself.’

            I think a person’s personal twitter account and the things they tweet and re-tweet is an epistolary form all in its own. There’s a lot you can learn from what people tweet and re-tweet. It’s a series of on-going thoughts and events that you share with the world and if you compiled the ones you write each day, they’d form a journal entry or perhaps even a letter. I’ll use my twitter page as an example. On my twitter page today, if you compiled it and made it into a journal or letter form, it would read something like this:

 

“I think Brockport should call it a day and cancel everything since it’s a white out outside. Brockport is two miles long so I don’t know if the plows are just taking the day off or what, but the roads are bad. Bless my teacher’s soul for cancelling night class! I think all I want for Valentine’s Day is a container of rainbow sprinkles; I think Melissa might agree with me. I read an article about Adam Brody thinking his character from The OC would be killed off by now, you should read it. I can’t believe so many people got so angry over the Coca-Cola commercial; someone joked that unless you came over on the Mayflower, you shouldn’t be upset. I thought that was funny. I found some pictures of puppies today and I wanted to show you – look at these!”

 

          Essentially, this is my day via my tweets.  Comprised together in a sensible form, it can read a lot like an e-mail or a letter. The author of a personal Twitter page, by tweeting, is inviting people to agree or disagree with what they’re saying. Readers can reply and challenge you, or re-tweet what you said and comment that they agree or were thinking the same thing. Mostly, tweets are individualized, but when you use hash-tags for shows and sporting events, you’re grouped in with the other people who are using the same hash-tag as you, putting their two-cents into what the topic is, too. I also think this epistolary form, as a series of thoughts and ideas by one person, can tell you a lot about who they are and what kind of personality and morals they have. That’s how the narrative is created in this form, through the recording of a series of events and thoughts in 140 characters or less. There is no beginning and end; it’s an ongoing overflow of personal thoughts. Notice how in the comprised letter I made up based on my tweets today, I went from talking about Brockport & the weather, to sprinkles, television shows and advertisements, and then ended with puppies. It’s all a series of events and thoughts that are thought to be notable enough to share or express with someone other than oneself, and that’s all letters and other epistolary forms really are.

5 comments:

  1. Twitter is definitely an epistolary form. In Clarissa, the correspondence is generally between two people (usually Clarissa and Anna), but with Twitter, the whole world (but mostly your followers) can read your tweets and thoughts that you share with them. Of course you can take the “sub-tweet” into consideration, but even when a tweet is meant for or directed at a certain person, everyone can read it.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I totally agree with your analysis of Twitter being an epistolary form. However, I don't think that is is just used as a sort of diary of daily events for you and your friends. For example, I follow a few different news organizations, authors, publishing companies, and a ton of campus groups for updates on what is going on in the world around me in addition to what is going on with my friends. I even follow a few of my professors because they post tips for class and professional life after college!

    ReplyDelete
  3. I like the modern form of Twitter as opposed to Clarissa's letters. While I admit that I'm not on Twitter regularly or even daily, I still prefer the 140 characters limit to Clarissa's lengthy letters. I agree that it is an epistolary form in modern times, but I also agree with Beth that it is not strictly a source for friends to communicate. I follow athletes and news organizations, etc. and know how Twitter can be used in a professional manner.

    ReplyDelete
  4. It's definitely a way to put our thoughts and ideas out in the universe, big or small, for the world around to take interest in. I do believe it's an epistolary because it's a correspondence of sorts, however, are there still guidelines? I ask that because even though all the ideas of someone's day can be expanded into narratives of their day, the ideas by themselves are just ideas crammed together. They have nothing in common and no transition into each other. The only thing holding the ideas together is that they happened in the same day. As a reader the ideas the tweeter expresses can be interesting, but they happen too fast and randomly to be left at 140 characters. Unlike comments, stories/narratives are more than just insights.

    In Clarissa, she reflected on her feelings and the actions that occurred as did other characters, to the point they exhausted their descriptions. That's not the best to tell a story either. The point(s) the writer's trying to make can be lost from wordiness and lack of clarity. The plot line of the story balanced out the characters' introspection at times, but it would've been nice if they kept the idea they revisited within 140 characters or less.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Hmmm... we're back to the matter of whether the brevity of current epistolary forms is a good or a bad thing. The comments here seem to think it is more clear... but to play devil's advocate for a minute, it is also disjointed, right? Corinne, you point out that your collected tweets go from snow to sprinkles to puppies. Taken individually, each tweet isn't particularly opaque, but when strung together what do we get? Or do we need to string things together into a full-day narrative--why not just little bits and bites? What's the appropriate form for the way we live in 2014?

    And for the record--it is ridiculous that Brockport never has snow days. Is it some sick badge of pride?

    ReplyDelete