The narrator introduces Sir Walter Elliot and briefly
gives a description of his life history and quickly realized that all but one
of Sir Walter’s daughters are meaningless to him.
Original Passage: Chapter One, Page 7
“…Be it known then, that Sir Walter, like a good father,
(having met with one or two private disappointments in very unreasonable
applications) prided himself on remaining single for his dear daughter’s sake.
For one daughter, his eldest, he would really have given up any thing, which he
had not been very much tempted to do. Elizabeth had succeeded, at sixteen, to
all that was possible, of her mother’s rights and consequence; and being very
handsome, and very like himself, her influence had always been great, and they
had gone on together most happily. His two other children were of very inferior
value. Mary had acquired a little artificial importance, by becoming Mrs.
Charles Musgrove; but Anne, with an elegance of mind and sweetness of
character, which must have placed her high with any people of real
understanding, was nobody with either father or sister: her world had no
weight; her convenience was always to give away; – she was only Anne. “
Rewrite in Anne Elliot’s perspective:
Sir Walter Elliot was a good father, as good as fathers can be. I liked to think he never
re-married for the sake of my sisters and myself, but I’ve always had a hard
time believing that. You see, my father played favorites with my two sisters,
and I, worse than a small child favoring a certain color for every object they
possess. He was never subtle about the fact that Elizabeth, my oldest sister,
was his absolute favorite. He would do just about anything for her. I bet if
she wanted his Baronet title, he would seriously consider giving it to her
somehow. Perhaps he treated her like he did my late-mother because she was the
eldest and thought to be the care-taker of Mary, my other sister, and me. I personally think it's because they're similar in character and Elizabeth is the most appealing physically out of the three of us.
Mary, my younger sister, and I didn’t matter much to my
father. I suppose we didn’t have the appeal that Elizabeth did. Mary was
married to Charles Musgrove, but Charles and my father were like night and day.
I’m not sure what both my sisters have that I don’t. I regard myself to be
clever, as said by other people outside of familial ties, but this isn’t
important to my father. To him, I’ve always been the invisible middle child, the one to
be given away someday, the one that's just 'there'; my being didn’t matter to him.
I never thought about this scene in this way. I don't think that I noticed the first time I read it that he basically thinks Anne and Mary are worthless. And, further, Austen never addressed Anne's or Mary's thoughts about it. Did they know he thought of them as worthless? Did it upset them or were they just kind of used to it at this point? I think the way you accomplished this rewrite is very true to how a child would feel about the situation. She doesn't know what she did wrong. In all actuality, she probably did nothing wrong; he just feels favor with the child most like him. However, I think because we see their world through Anne's eyes mostly, we have a bias toward her. I think she might be my favorite of the Elliot's because she seems the least fake, but that is because we are in her head. We see her in her private moments. When, in all actuality, she may seem really fake to, for example, Captain Wentworth.
ReplyDeleteOverall, I like your interpretation. Awesome job.
Thanks for the feedback! I'd say Anne might be my favorite character too, but I feel she has a bad case of 'middle child syndrome!' She is the most reserved and practical one out of all the Elliot's, though. Elizabeth is vain like her father and Mary is a little crazy in my opinion. She's so obsessed with climbing the social ladder in their community. I think for these reasons, we could say Anne is favored not only because of the narrative bias but because...well...she's the most 'normal' of them all!
DeleteCorinne, you bring an interesting angle to Anne's character. We are led to identify with her throughout the novel, and to see her ultimate growth and judgments as good examples, but Austen never really lets her reflect upon the raw deal she seems to get from her father. Your interpretation here makes sense, because it is not bitter or resentful toward Sir Walter, but rather fairly matter-of-fact and resigned to the situation--this seems in keeping with Anne as one of the most level-headed characters in the novel. But I wonder about Austen's omission of this angle from the novel; does this suggest that the novel approves of silently rising above such maltreatment? In the novel's moral vision, where is there a place for recognizing the personal injustices that one's own family has meted out to them? Is this left to the realm of mocking those who commit them, without allowing the aggrieved (Anne, in this case) to register and address them?
ReplyDelete